Understanding New York’s Zero Tolerance Law for Underage DWI Offenders
New York has some of the strictest laws in the nation when it comes to underage drinking and driving. The state’s Zero Tolerance Law applies to drivers under the age...
In today’s digital age, cell phones are more than just communication tools—they’ve become personal data hubs capable of revealing a person’s whereabouts, habits, and connections. In New York criminal cases, law enforcement frequently uses cell phone tracking to establish a suspect’s location during an alleged crime. But how reliable is this data?
At O’Brien & Eggleston, our Albany criminal defense attorneys are here to explore the nuances of cell phone location tracking, its role in criminal cases, and why it’s not always as trustworthy as it seems.
Cell phone tracking relies on a combination of technologies to estimate a person’s location:
While these methods can provide valuable insights, they’re not foolproof and often require scrutiny in legal proceedings.
Law enforcement often uses cell phone tracking data to:
For example, if a phone’s location data indicates that it was near the scene of a robbery at the time it occurred, prosecutors may use this information to argue the phone’s owner was involved. However, location data is far from conclusive and should not be treated as definitive evidence.
Despite its widespread use, cell phone tracking data has several limitations and vulnerabilities that can make it unreliable:
GPS data is typically accurate within a few meters, but its reliability can be influenced by environmental factors such as tall buildings, tunnels, or adverse weather conditions. In contrast, cell tower triangulation is significantly less precise, often only identifying a general area rather than a specific location.
Law enforcement or prosecutors may misinterpret or oversimplify complex location data, leading to incorrect conclusions about a suspect’s whereabouts.
Just because a phone was in a specific location doesn’t mean the owner was. Phones can be stolen, borrowed, or left behind, making equating phone data with a person’s movements risky.
Digital data can be altered or corrupted, raising questions about its integrity. Without proper safeguards, location data might not reflect the truth.
Obtaining location data often requires a warrant. The evidence could be deemed inadmissible in court if law enforcement fails to follow proper procedures.
At O’Brien & Eggleston, we recognize that location data is not infallible and must be rigorously challenged when used as evidence in a criminal case.
Our defense strategies may include:
Cell phone tracking data can be a powerful tool for prosecutors, but it has flaws. As experienced criminal defense attorneys in Albany, we understand the complexities of digital evidence and know how to expose its weaknesses.
At O’Brien & Eggleston, we work tirelessly to ensure no flawed or misinterpreted evidence is used against our clients. Whether it’s challenging the accuracy of cell phone data or questioning the methods used to obtain it, we leave no stone unturned in defending your rights.
If you’re facing criminal charges and cell phone tracking data is being used against you, don’t face it alone. Contact O’Brien & Eggleston today at (518)-391-2369 or online for a free consultation. Our skilled Albany County criminal defense lawyers are ready to defend your rights and ensure a fair legal process.
New York has some of the strictest laws in the nation when it comes to underage drinking and driving. The state’s Zero Tolerance Law applies…
Technology has made it easier than ever to share personal photos and videos. While many of these exchanges are consensual, there are situations where intimate…
Most people assume that being charged with murder means someone intentionally caused another person’s death. In New York, however, that is not always the case.…
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
© 2025 All Rights Reserved.